Hero Background Image
Quarterly Letter

Baron Technology ETF | Q4 2025

Portfolio managers Michael Lippert and Ashim Mehra

Dear Baron Technology ETF Shareholder:

During the fourth quarter, Baron Technology ETF® (the Fund) posted a decline of 0.77%(NAV), underperforming the MSCI ACWI Information Technology Index (the Benchmark), which gained 2.88%; the Invesco QQQ Trust (the QQQ), which increased 2.42%; and the broader S&P 500 Index, which rose 2.66%. For the full year 2025, the Fund appreciated 17.34%, trailing the Benchmark, which returned 26.37%, as well as the QQQ and S&P 500 Index, which gained 20.77% and 17.88%, respectively. *

On a trailing three-year basis, the Fund generated an annualized return of 41.50%, beating the Benchmark and the QQQ, which were up 35.93% and 32.91%, respectively.

On December 12, 2025, Baron Technology Fund® was converted from a mutual fund into an exchange-traded fund, Baron Technology ETF™. For additional information please refer to the prospectus.

The ETF has an identical investment goal and substantially similar investment strategies as its predecessor mutual fund.

NAV and Market Price returns include returns of the Institutional Shares of the predecessor mutual fund prior to the ETF’s commencement of operations. Prior to the ETF's listing on 12/15/2025 the NAV returns of the Institutional Shares of the predecessor mutual fund are used as proxy market price returns. If the predecessor mutual fund had been structured as an ETF, its performance may have differed.

Annualized for periods ended December 31, 2025
 ETF1,2MSCI ACWI Information
Technology Index1
S&P 500
Index1
MSCI ACWI
Index1
QTD3(0.77) 2.88 2.66 3.29 
1 Year17.34  26.37 17.88 22.34 
3 Years41.50  35.93 23.01 20.65 
Since Inception
(12/31/2021)
12.08  14.70 11.11 9.43 

Performance listed in the above table is net of annual operating expenses. The total annual fund operating expense as of December 5, 2025 was 0.75%. The performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate; an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original. T Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. For performance information current to the most recent month-end, visit BaronCapitalGroup.com or call 1-800-99-BARON.

Review & Outlook

Market Backdrop

The fourth quarter of 2025 provided a steady finish to an otherwise turbulent year, with moderate gains across most indices amid easing economic pressures and holiday-season stability. The S&P 500 Index advanced 2.66% in the fourth quarter, supported by continued recovery momentum, while the NASDAQ Composite Index rose 2.72%. December 2025 was relatively flat, with the S&P 500 inching up just 0.06%, and the NASDAQ declining 0.47%.

Several factors underpinned fourth quarter gains and a sustained market rebound from the April 8 lows: moderating tariff impacts, robust corporate earnings, and continued monetary easing. Following a September rate cut of 25 basis points, the Federal Reserve lowered rates twice more during the fourth quarter – by 25 basis points each in October and December.

Performance

The Portfolio declined slightly during the quarter and underperformed both the Benchmark and the QQQ. The common drivers of both shortfalls were poor stock selection in sectors outside of Information Technology (IT) and not owning or being underweight strong performers in our two main yardsticks.

Versus the Benchmark

Relative to the Benchmark, the Fund outperformed the core IT sector. We had strong gains and relative performance from optical networking leaders, Lumentum Holdings Inc. and Coherent Corp. See below for more in-depth discussions of these two companies. The strength of these holdings was somewhat offset by a meaningful pullback in leading cybersecurity vendor, Zscaler, Inc. (discussed more fully below). The Fund's relative underweight in Apple Inc. and memory suppliers, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Micron Technology, Inc., further detracted from relative performance.

This quarter the Fund's investments outside of IT led to the shortfall versus the Benchmark, which limits constituents to that sector alone. In Communications Services, the Fund's large position in Spotify Technology S.A. (global streaming music and content leader) had the most significant negative impact on relative performance. Spotify, discussed more fully below, posted solid gains for the year (up 30%). In Consumer Discretionary, sharp pullbacks from Duolingo, Inc. (language learning platform) and Eternal Limited (India food delivery and quick commerce platform) also hurt relative performance. We exited both positions during the quarter, as discussed below. The Fund's unique exposure to Industrials, Real Estate, and Consumer Staples also weighed on relative performance, as a handful of our holdings in these sectors posted double-digit losses.

Versus the QQQ’s

The Fund also outperformed within the IT sector against the QQQ, with the same investments mentioned above leading the way. This strength was offset by negative returns from Zscaler and Oracle Corporation (discussed below). The Fund's underweight position in Micron and lack of ownership of semiconductor vendor, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) further mitigated sector relative performance.

Weakness in Communication Services accounted for nearly half of the Fund's relative underperformance. The main drivers were poor performance from Spotify and our non-ownership of Alphabet Inc., which continued its strong second half run. Alphabet stands at the crossroads of AI. It possesses the scale, technical advantages, brands, and distribution to be a long-term AI winner, and its innovation and execution cadence improved in the later part of the year. But it also has a lot to lose if its near-monopoly commercial search business is disrupted by AI. We continue to carefully study and analyze Alphabet as part of our broader AI, e-commerce, and digital media/advertising coverage.

The Fund's Health Care underweight versus the QQQ also hindered performance, as the sector had an 18% return in the period while our two small investments lagged. Duolingo and Eternal hurt relative performance in Consumer Discretionary, as recounted above.

AI Update

Now just over three years since the “ChatGPT moment” rang the opening bell of the age of AI, there remains little dispute that AI is the most powerful and impactful technology platform shift and secular growth driver since the advent of the internet itself. It has also been the predominant driver of stock leadership and returns over the last three years. On stage at this year’s Baron Annual Investment Conference, we answered questions about AI and here’s a snapshot of what we presented:

  • There is plenty of debate about AI—among investors and certainly in the finance media, whether CNBC, bloggers, podcasters, and X posters. We’ve seen AI sell offs—both broad based and stock specific—on clips or sound bites taken out of context or on trepidations like the DeepSeek alarm that sounded earlier this year. We did a public webinar on the Deep Seek scare and explained that the reported innovations, if true, were merely another data point on the AI innovation line and would have been dismissed if the AI Lab had been, say, French instead of Chinese. We explained how financial and social media pundits played up Sputnik type fears to get eyeballs and engagement. We caution investors to separate the signal from the noise and not get caught in sentiment swings.
  • At Baron, we are deep research, evidence-based investors. We are positive about AI because it is real. It is the most significant change to the global economy since the internet itself. Every digital interaction of today forward will have AI as the brains of the application. We have investments across all the layers of the AI stack and spanning industries. Our most successful investments to date have been in the infrastructure or compute layer. We were early investors in NVIDIA Corporation, before the ChatGPT moment of November 2022, and it has been a 6.2-bagger for the Fund. Several of us spent a full day with founder and CEO Jensen Huang in the Fall of 2018, where he went to the white board to teach us about AI and why NVIDIA would win.

Ron Baron visits Nvidia HQ with CEO Jensen Huang in 2018., November 28, 2018

Baron Visits Nvidia's Headquarters
November 28, 2018
  • We invested in Broadcom Inc. nearly three years ago after spending two hours with its CEO and founder Hock Tan. Broadcom has been a 5.6-bagger for the Fund. These returns resulted from explosive growth not multiple expansion.
  • As you witnessed with the CEOs who spoke this morning, Baron research starts with people. We look for founders and management teams that are exceptional–but also who think long term and remain focused on building, not just managing. We also believe that sustained innovation is the competitive advantage of the future. In the past, a moat might have meant first-to-market, a distribution network, intellectual property, brands, or scale, and while these hold true, we think in today’s fast-moving world how fast a company can innovate, adapt, launch, and then scale new products is another critical competitive advantage. Baron investments like NVIDIA, Tesla, Inc., SpaceX, Spotify, and Shopify Inc. embody this mindset.
  • We are not resting on our laurels; we are investing forward. The theme of the conference 10 years ago was “question everything.” That’s a key part of our research DNA and what we’re doing with AI. While I don’t have the time to list everything, a few of the key issues that we are questioning and studying include: scaling laws for model training, post training, and reasoning; the adoption, penetration, impact, and value (cost savings or monetization) of AI workflows and use cases for consumers and businesses alike; whether we can generate and deliver enough energy to power the compute data centers; and how AI investments will be financed, including how that will be different for the Magnificent Seven players like Alphabet, Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Tesla, who can fund their investments with internal cash flow versus the AI lab start-ups like OpenAI, xAI, and Anthropic, which need outside financing.
  • In our view, the most important thing to study is not the race to Artificial General Intelligence or Artificial Super Intelligence but the utility and value of AI. We recently listened to a recent podcast with Andrei Karpathy, a prominent AI researcher and engineer, who worked at both OpenAI and Tesla, and who we have met in our work at Baron. One thing resonated with us (and we’re paraphrasing): Let’s focus on building useful things, not AI animals.
  • AI is already delivering value and proving useful: AI software code development—near 100% adoption and productivity improvements of 30% to 50% or higher; AI has delivered significant cost savings in customer service; Tesla Robotaxis are driven by AI; Axon Enterprise, Inc. is using AI to prepare first drafts of police reports; Heartflow, Inc. is using AI to advance heart disease diagnostics and save lives; and this will be the first holiday season of AI commerce, where Shopify’s Catalog product will enable consumers to compete purchases with Shopify merchants without leaving AI chatbots. The massive opportunity ahead of us is scientific discovery—such as AI acting as the Rosetta Stone to help humans decipher the genetic language of cancer and other diseases.
  • Technology paradigm shifts have multiple phases. The internet started on the desktop, then mobile, then the cloud. AI’s impact on the world will not be one S-curve, but a series of stacked S-curves. We have investments across different phases of AI and among many of these S-curves. While our most successful investments to date have been in the infrastructure layer of AI, we also have excellent investments across other layers of the AI stack, such as the application layer and physical AI.

Top Contributors to Performance

Top contributors to performance for the quarter ended
 Contribution to Return (%)
Lumentum Holdings Inc.2.46 
Coherent Corp.1.33 
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited0.58 
Lam Research Corporation0.44 
Broadcom Inc.0.32 

Lumentum Holdings Inc. is a leading photonics innovator specializing in indium phosphide-based lasers and components for optical modules that power high-speed AI data center networks. Lumentum is capitalizing on the explosive growth in AI data center buildouts, with cloud and AI infrastructure now driving over 60% of its revenue amid surging demand for next-generation laser components. As the market leader in laser production, the company is leveraging its dominant position in a supply-constrained environment, with electro-absorption modulated laser demand already sold out through 2026. The company also plans to expand indium phosphide capacity by 40% in the coming quarters. Lumentum is also poised to spearhead key technological shifts over the next two years, including optical circuit switches for intra-data center connectivity and advancements in co-packaged optics via external laser source modules. We remain confident that Lumentum will continue to thrive as a core enabler of the secular shift toward deeper optical communication integration in AI ecosystems.

Coherent Corp. is a premier photonics leader delivering advanced optical solutions essential for AI-driven networks to the data center, communications, and industrial markets, with a portfolio spanning high-speed transceivers, lasers, and integrated components. The company's robust growth is fueled by surging AI infrastructure expansion and the deepening integration of optical communications across datacenter architectures, with its networking segment now accounting for over 60% of total revenue. As the largest major Western optical transceiver manufacturer enabling intra-data center server connectivity, Coherent holds a commanding competitive edge, bolstered by its end-to-end vertical integration—from advanced materials like indium phosphide and gallium arsenide to lasers, critical components, and full transceiver modules—that not only powers its own products but also supplies key elements to customers throughout the AI supply chain. Shares rose in the quarter based on several positive developments —strong forward demand indicators for 800 gigabits per second and 1.6 terabits per second transceivers yielding multi-year bookings, alleviating supply bottlenecks through its six-inch wafer production ramp (doubling internal capacity over the next year across facilities in Texas and Sweden), and heightened optimism around innovative advancements such as optical circuit switches (with shipments to seven customers and a projected $2 billion market opportunity) and co-packaged optics. We believe Coherent will persist as a top-tier beneficiary of optical communications' pivotal expansion in data centers and broader AI infrastructure.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) contributed to performance during the quarter, as revenue growth exceeded expectations due to surging demand for AI chips. TSMC dominates the advanced semiconductor foundry market, controlling over 90% share of the cutting-edge sub-7 nanometer (nm) nodes that power AI servers, flagship smartphones, and autonomous vehicles. TSMC benefits from a virtuous cycle, where its massive scale and profitability generate the capital necessary for industry-leading R&D and capex, which in turn widen its technological moat and reinforce its pricing power. As the ultimate "picks and shovels" provider of the AI era, TSMC remains insulated from the competitive dynamics within the AI chip design ecosystem. Whether hyperscalers develop custom accelerators or deploy merchant graphics processing units from companies like NVIDIA and AMD, nearly all advanced AI accelerators are manufactured exclusively at TSMC’s 3nm and 5nm nodes. Arizona serves as the cornerstone of TSMC’s geographic diversification. Since commencing high-volume production at its first Arizona fab in late 2024, the company has accelerated construction of two additional fabs targeting advanced nodes. Crucially, early yields in Arizona are comparable to its Taiwan fabs, proving TSMC can replicate its manufacturing excellence internationally. We believe TSMC’s scale and pricing power will offset higher manufacturing costs in Arizona and sustain robust margins. We project TSMC will deliver 15% to 20% earnings growth over the next five years, supported by secular AI-driven demand for leading-edge capacity.

Top Detractors from Performance

Top detractors from performance for the quarter
 Contribution to Return (%)
Spotify Technology S.A.(0.83) 
Oracle Corporation(0.71) 
Zscaler, Inc.(0.54) 
Duolingo, Inc.(0.42) 
Eternal Limited(0.34) 

Spotify Technology S.A. is a leading global digital audio service, offering on-demand music, podcasts, and audiobooks streaming through paid premium subscriptions and an ad-supported model. In our view, Spotify's stock pulled back during the quarter for reasons completely unrelated to its durable competitive advantages, long-term opportunity, or robust fundamentals, namely: (i) a lack of near-term catalysts; and (ii) sympathy with Netflix, whose own stock fell in connection with the Warner Brothers escalating takeover battle between it and Paramount. These are temporary factors. More importantly, Spotify continues to demonstrate double-digit user growth and industry-leading engagement levels. The platform's pricing power is evident as customer retention held despite recent hikes in several markets. The company also continues on its path to structurally higher gross margins, aided by its high-margin artist-promotions marketplace, scaling its podcast offering, and product and network improvements in its advertising business. Finally, Spotify's product innovation cadence remains rapid, including AI personalization, video content, and a Super Premium tier in development. We still view Spotify as a long-term winner in entertainment streaming with potential to reach over 1 billion monthly active users. At Spotify’s current price, we believe the risk/reward is quite attractive.

Oracle Corporation is a leading software applications and infrastructure company. As the company's core software application and database businesses have matured, founder Larry Ellison and his management team pivoted in an attempt to become the fourth cloud service provider “hyperscaler”4 with the build-out of its Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offering. In so doing, the profile of the company has morphed from an asset-light, highly profitable mature software business to one that can best be described as a growth-acceleration story, requiring significant capital investments to build out its data center footprint. When the company reported its August 2025 quarter, it stunned the market with its OCI backlog surging 359% year-over-year to $455 billion, among one of the largest backlog increases ever seen. A couple of months later, at its analyst day event in October, the company raised its long-term guidance both for revenue and earnings per share on the back of robust demand for AI compute. Frustrating investors, however, Oracle did not break out its backlog by customer, but analysts believe OpenAI is north of 80% of the total. After the October event, Oracle shares started to slide on concerns around the OpenAI concentration and financing needs for both OpenAI and Oracle itself. We decided to exit the Oracle position and book a short-term tax loss, spreading the capital across several of the investments listed above.

Zscaler, Inc. is a top cybersecurity company specializing in Secure Access Service Edge, a modern cloud-based approach that combines networking and security into one seamless service. Instead of relying on traditional data-center security, Zscaler moves protection to the “cloud edge,” allowing users to securely access company apps from anywhere—whether at home, in the office, or on the go—while keeping connections fast and safe. For instance, a remote worker can log into corporate systems via a web browser, and Zscaler’s platform automatically applies the company’s security rules to ensure they’re only accessing approved resources. Despite delivering strong financial results for its first fiscal quarter of 2026—beating expectations on revenue, earnings, and other key metrics—the stock price fell. This underperformance stemmed from two main investor concerns: (i) revenue breakdown: questions arose about how much of the $21 million boost in its annual recurring revenue guidance (ARR) came from Zscaler’s core operations versus its recent acquisition of Red Canary. Management did not provide a precise breakdown but emphasized steady organic growth at 22% and raised its full-year ARR growth guidance to 23%. (ii) Timing of new business: The updated outlook indicated that about 48% of this fiscal year’s net-new ARR would come in the first half of the year. The math on this suggested lower fiscal second quarter growth than the market had projected, but we view the implied guidance on this metric as quite conservative. We believe these short-term concerns overlook Zscaler’s long-term strengths, which position it as a key player in cybersecurity.

Portfolio Structure

We invest in companies of any market capitalization that we believe will deliver durable growth from the development, advancement, and/or use of technology. We invest principally in U.S. securities but may invest up to 35% in non-U.S. securities.

At the end of the fourth quarter, the largest market cap holding in the Fund was $4.5 trillion and the smallest was $777 million. The median market cap of the Fund was $44.8 billion and the weighted average market cap was $1.5 trillion.

We had investments in 39 unique companies. Our top 10 positions accounted for 61.9% of net assets.

To end the quarter, the Fund had $149 million in net assets.

Flows were positive in the fourth quarter and for the year.

Top 10 holdings
 Quarter End Market Cap ($B)Quarter End Investment Value ($M)Percent of Net Assets (%)
NVIDIA Corporation4,532.0 17.5 11.8 
Broadcom Inc.1,641.0 15.0 10.1 
Amazon.com, Inc.2,467.5 11.7 7.9 
Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company Limited
1,576.1 11.0 7.4 
Tesla, Inc.1,495.7 8.4 5.6 
Microsoft Corporation3,594.4 7.4 4.9 
Spotify Technology S.A.121.1 6.3 4.2 
Lumentum Holdings Inc.26.1 5.1 3.4 
Coherent Corp.29.0 5.0 3.3 
Lam Research Corporation215.5 4.8 3.2 
Fund investments in GICS industries
 Percent of Net Assets (%)
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment37.1    
Software19.6    
Broadline Retail7.9    
Automobiles5.6    
Communications Equipment4.6    
Entertainment4.2    
Aerospace & Defense3.8    
Electronic Equipment Instruments & Components3.3    
IT Services3.0    
Technology Hardware Storage & Peripherals2.6    
Interactive Media & Services2.2    
Health Care Providers & Services1.5    
Construction & Engineering1.2    
Hotels Restaurants & Leisure1.2    
Building Products0.9    
Health Care Technology0.4    
Cash and Cash Equivalents0.9    
Total100.0* 

* Individual weights may not sum to the displayed total due to rounding.

Recent Activity

Top net purchases for the quarter
 Quarter End Market Cap
($B)
Net Amount Purchased
($M)
Broadcom Inc.1,641.0 5.2 
Amazon.com, Inc.2,467.5 4.0 
Meta Platforms, Inc.1,664.1 3.5 
Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company Limited
1,576.1 3.4 
Axon Enterprise, Inc.44.8 3.4 

We added to our Broadcom Inc. Position during the quarter. Broadcom is a leading semiconductor and enterprise software company, generating approximately 60% of revenue from semiconductors and 40% from software. The company remains strategically positioned at the intersection of high-performance AI compute and networking infrastructure, while also demonstrating disciplined execution in software. Broadcom continues to extend its leadership in networking silicon, from the cloud era into the AI era, and has established itself as the most reliable silicon partner for AI foundational model builders designing custom accelerator chips to train and inference frontier models. While Broadcom continues to execute with its key custom chip customer, Google, it is also ramping volume production with two additional customers (likely Meta and ByteDance), and has secured a fourth customer with orders worth $10 billion this year, and announced a 10 gigawatt deal with a notable fifth customer, OpenAI. Beyond AI, Broadcom is advancing VMware integration, while its non-AI semiconductor businesses appear to be bottoming and may gradually recover in the coming quarters.

While 2025 was a difficult year for Amazon.com, Inc., we believe that 2026 is poised to be better. We believe that Amazon Web Services (AWS) growth should accelerate to the mid-20s, based on contracts with Anthropic and other large enterprise customers. The company is also rolling out its new Tranium 3 chipset on AWS and has improved access to NVIDIA’s chip supply than it did in 2025. We also believe Amazon’s advertising business continues to drive greater incremental profitability for the company, and the rollout of robotics in their warehouses should help the company reduce fulfillment costs. In our view, the combination of faster AWS growth, and better profitability in the core retail segment, positions Amazon as an attractive investment.

We initiated a position in Meta Platforms, Inc. based on the belief that the narrative around the company will improve throughout 2026 and beyond. Even though Meta has delivered solid topline growth, beating Street expectations consistently, investor sentiment turned negative with the perception that Meta has fallen behind the other frontier AI model companies and is not earning sufficient returns on its large operating and capital investments. Trading at the lowest earnings multiple of the Magnificent Seven, we believe the risk/reward on Meta is attractive, and that investor sentiment will turn as the company is poised to launch two new large language models in the first half of 2026.

Top net sales for the quarter
 Quarter End Market Cap or Market Cap When Sold ($B)Net Amount Sold
($M)
Eternal Limited31.4 2.6 
Duolingo, Inc.11.9 2.3 
The Trade Desk23.3 2.0 
HPSP Co., Ltd.1.7 1.1 
Gartner, Inc.18.5 1.1 

We decided to exit our long-term investment in The Trade Desk, predominantly due to mounting competitive pressures from Amazon's aggressive ad-tech push. While we do not believe Amazon has yet captured meaningful market share, our industry checks suggested that more agencies and media buyers are inclined to try and expand budgets with Amazon in 2026, which is leveraging exclusive Prime Video and Netflix inventory and offering significantly lower take rates. This situation was further exacerbated by substantial executive turnover. Given these challenges, combined with less consistency in recent results, we found the risk/reward balance to be unfavorable and chose to sell our position. Given the company's and CEO Jeff Green's prior track record, we continue to research and analyze the company and reserve the right to revisit an investment in The Trade Desk.

We decided to sell our position in Duolingo, Inc. this quarter before the company reported third quarter earnings. Our thesis in Duolingo was that given how large the opportunity was for global language learning, the company could continue to grow users at rates well north of 25% for years to come. We had previously considered decelerating user metrics to be a temporary result of a brief reduction in marketing spend following social media backlash related to the company's AI posts. However, early in the quarter, our research indicated that the user slowdown continued unabated. In its earnings report, management signaled growth concerns by acknowledging the trend through October and choosing to delay monetization levers, resulting in a meaningful deceleration in bookings growth. We believe this decision would not have been necessary if organic growth had remained more robust. Shares of Duolingo are down meaningfully since the report and our sale.

We exited out of our position in Gartner, Inc. to reallocate to higher conviction ideas, including our investments in optics-related names.

Finally, in preparation for a conversion to an actively managed ETF, we sold shares of Eternal Limited (India) and HPSP Co., Ltd. (Korea), as the Fund needed to re-apply for approval to trade in those geographies under the new structure.

Looking Ahead

Looking ahead, while 2025 was a disappointing year for us, we continue to uncover compelling long-term investments that meet our criteria. We remain focused on owning category-defining technology businesses that sit at the heart of durable, secular growth trends. Led by visionary, execution-driven management teams, these companies convert breakthrough innovation into expanding free cash flow. We believe this combination uniquely positions the Fund to compound our investors’ capital over the long term.

Sincerely,

Portfolio Manager Michael Lippert signature
Michael A. LippertPortfolio Manager
Portfolio Manager Ashim Mehra signature
Ashim MehraPortfolio Manager

Featured ETF

Learn more about Baron Technology ETF.